Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations, Plans and Training (G3/5/7)

In the US Army, Patrick Matlock is the Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations, Plans, and Training (G-3/5/7) serving on Army Staff for operations (G-3), plans (G-5), and training (G-7). Both G-8 and G-3/5/7 sit on the Army Requirements Oversight Council (AROC), chaired by the Chief of Staff of the Army (CSA). [1][2]

The Army's Force management model[3]:diagram on p.559 begins with a projection of the Future operating environment, in terms of resources: political, military, economic, social, information, infrastructure, physical environment, and the time available to bring the Current army to bear on the situation.[2]

The AROC serves as a discussion forum of these factors.[1]

A DOTMLPF analysis models the factors necessary to change the Current force into a relevant Future force.[2]

The relevant strategy is provided by the Army's leadership to guide Army staff.[3]

The resources are "dictated by Congress".[2]

A JCIDS process identifies the gaps in capability between Current and Future force.[2]

A Force design to meet the materiel gaps is then underway.[2]

An organization with the desired capabilities (manpower, materiel, training) is brought to bear on each gap.[2]

  • AR 5-22(pdf) lists the Force modernization proponent for each Army branch, which can be a CoE or Branch proponent leader.
  • Army Staff uses a Synchronization meeting before seeking approval —HTAR Force Management 3-2b: "Managing change in any large, complex organization requires the synchronization of many interrelated processes".[3]:p2-27

A budget request is submitted to Congress.[2]

Approved requests then await resource deliveries which then become available to the combatant commanders.[2]

Notes

    1. Headquarters, Department of the Army (29 Jun 2021) Army Regulation 71–9 Force Management. Warfighting Capabilities Determination °1-6c, p.1) tasks for CG,AFC; °2-24 p.13) CG,AFC is a principal member of AROC, with 43 duties a through qq; °3-1 ch.3 pp20-21) AROC is a forum for requirements decisions (RDF); °4-1 p.24) CG,AFC is responsible for force design; °6-4 p39) figure 6-1 Deliberate staffing and review process; figures for more staffing and review processes follow.
    2. James Kennedy (2019) Force Management Model - Complete
    3. United States Army War College and Army Force Management School (2019-2020) How the Army Runs HTAR: A senior leader reference handbook which synthesizes "existing and developing National, Defense, Joint, and Army systems, processes, and procedures currently practiced"
    This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.