Group delay and phase delay
In signal processing, group delay and phase delay are delay times experienced by a signal's various frequency components when the signal passes through a linear time-invariant system (LTI), such as a microphone, coaxial cable, amplifier, loudspeaker, telecommunications system or ethernet cable. These delays are generally frequency dependent,[1] which means that different frequency components experience different delays. As a result, the signal's waveform experiences distortion as it passes through the system. This distortion can cause problems such as poor fidelity in analog video and analog audio, or a high bit-error rate in a digital bit stream. For a modulation signal (passband signal), the information carried by the signal is carried exclusively in the wave envelope. Group delay therefore operates only with the frequency components derived from the envelope.
Introduction
The group delay and phase delay properties of a linear time-invariant (LTI) system are functions of frequency, giving the time from when a frequency component of a time varying physical quantity—for example a voltage signal—appears at the LTI system input, to the time when a copy of that same frequency component—perhaps of a different physical phenomenon—appears at the LTI system output.
A varying phase response as a function of frequency, from which group delay and phase delay can be calculated, typically occurs in devices such as microphones, amplifiers, loudspeakers, magnetic recorders, headphones, coaxial cables, and antialiasing filters.[2] All frequency components of a signal are delayed when passed through such devices, or when propagating through space or a medium, such as air or water.
Phase delay
A linear time-invariant system or device has a phase response property and a phase delay property, where one can be calculated exactly from the other. Phase delay directly measures the device or system time delay of individual frequency components.[3] If the phase delay function at any given frequency—within a frequency range of interest—has the same constant of proportionality between the phase at a selected frequency and the selected frequency itself, the system/device will have the ideal of a flat phase delay property, a.k.a. linear phase.[1] Since phase delay is a function of frequency giving time delay, a departure from the flatness of its function graph can reveal time delay differences among the various signal frequency components, in which case those differences will contribute to signal distortion, which is manifested as the output signal waveform shape being different from that of the input signal. The phase delay property in general does not give useful information if the device input is a modulated signal. For that, group delay must be used.
Group delay

The group delay is a convenient measure of the linearity of the phase with respect to frequency in a modulation system.[4][5]
Basic modulation system
A device's group delay can be exactly calculated from the device's phase response, but not the other way around.
The simplest use case for group delay is illustrated in Figure 1 which shows a conceptual modulation system, which is itself an LTI system with a baseband output that is ideally an accurate copy of the baseband signal input. This system as a whole is referred to here as the outer LTI system/device, which contains an inner (red block) LTI system/device. As is often the case for a radio system, the inner red LTI system in Fig 1 can represent two LTI systems in cascade, for example an amplifier driving a transmitting antenna at the sending end and the other an antenna and amplifier at the receiving end.
Amplitude Modulation
Amplitude modulation creates the passband signal by shifting the baseband frequency components to a much higher frequency range. Although the frequencies are different, the passband signal carries the same information as the baseband signal. The demodulator does the inverse, shifting the passband frequencies back down to the original baseband frequency range. Ideally, the output (baseband) signal is a time delayed version of the input (baseband) signal where the waveform shape of the output is identical to that of the input.
In Figure 1, the outer system phase delay is the meaningful performance metric. For amplitude modulation, the inner red LTI device group delay becomes the outer LTI device phase delay. If the inner red device group delay is completely flat in the frequency range of interest, the outer device will have the ideal of a phase delay that is also completely flat, where the contribution of distortion due to the outer LTI device’s phase response—determined entirely by the inner device’s possibly different phase response—is eliminated. In that case, the group delay of the inner red device and the phase delay of the outer device give the same time delay figure for the signal as a whole, from the baseband input to the baseband output. It is significant to note that it is possible for the inner (red) device to have a very non-flat phase delay (but flat group delay), while the outer device has the ideal of a perfectly flat phase delay. This is fortunate because in LTI device design, a flat group delay is easier to achieve than a flat phase delay.
Angle Modulation
In an angle-modulation system—such as with frequency modulation (FM) or phase modulation (PM)—the (FM or PM) passband signal applied to an LTI system input can be analyzed as two separate passband signals, an in-phase (I) amplitude modulation AM passband signal and a quadrature-phase (Q) amplitude modulation AM passband signal, where their sum exactly reconstructs the original angle-modulation (FM or PM) passband signal. While the (FM/PM) passband signal is not amplitude modulation, and therefore has no apparent outer envelope, the I and Q passband signals do indeed have amplitude modulation envelopes. (However, unlike with regular amplitude modulation, the I and Q envelopes do not resemble the wave shape of the baseband signals, even though 100 percent of the baseband signal is represented in a complex manner by their envelopes.) So, for each of the I and Q passband signals, a flat group delay ensures that neither the I pass band envelope nor the Q passband envelope will have wave shape distortion, so when the I passband signal and the Q passband signal is added back together, the sum is the original FM/PM passband signal, which will also be unaltered.
Background
Frequency components of a signal
For a periodic signal, a frequency component is a sinusoid with properties that include time-based frequency and phase.
Generating a basic sinusoid
The sinusoid, with or without a time based frequency property, is generated by a circle as shown in the figure. In this example, the sinusoid is a sine wave that is traced out using the trigonometric function.

When an increasing angle makes a complete CCW rotation around the circle, one cycle of the function’s pattern is generated. Further increasing the angle beyond 360 degrees simply rotates around the circle again, completing another cycle, where each succeeding cycle repeats the same pattern, making the function periodic. (See "Rotating vector..." animation on the left.) The angle value has no limit, and so the number of times the pattern repeats itself also has no limit. Because of this, a sinusoid has no beginning and no end. A sinusoidal function is based on either or both of the trigonometric functions and .
Theory
In LTI system theory, control theory, and in digital or analog signal processing, the relationship between the input signal, and the output signal, , of an LTI system is governed by a convolution operation:
Or, in the frequency domain,
where
and
- .
Here is the time-domain impulse response of the LTI system and , , , are the Laplace transforms of the input , output , and impulse response , respectively. is called the transfer function of the LTI system and, like the impulse response , fully defines the input-output characteristics of the LTI system.
Suppose that such a system is driven by a quasi-sinusoidal signal, such as a sinusoid having an amplitude envelope that is slowly changing relative to the frequency of the sinusoid. Mathematically, this means that the quasi-sinusoidal driving signal has the form
and the slowly changing amplitude envelope means that
Then the output of such an LTI system is very well approximated as
Here is the group delay and is the phase delay, and they are given by the expressions below (and potentially are functions of the angular frequency ). The phase of the sinusoid, as indicated by the positions of the zero crossings, is delayed in time by an amount equal to the phase delay, . The envelope of the sinusoid is delayed in time by the group delay, .
In a linear phase system (with non-inverting gain), both and are constant (i.e., independent of ) and equal, and their common value equals the overall delay of the system; and the unwrapped phase shift of the system (namely ) is negative, with magnitude increasing linearly with frequency .
More generally, it can be shown that for an LTI system with transfer function driven by a complex sinusoid of unit amplitude,
the output is
where the phase shift is
Additionally, it can be shown that the group delay, , and phase delay, , are frequency-dependent.[6] They can be computed from the unwrapped phase shift by
- .
That is, the group delay at each frequency equals the negative of the slope of the phase at that frequency[7] (compare to instantaneous frequency).
Negative group delay
Circuits with negative group delay are possible, though causality is not violated.[8] If signals (in a band where group delay is negative) are predictable (such as a Gaussian pulse), negative group delay filters are able to predict the input, providing an illusion of a non-causal time advance. However, if the signal contains an unpredictable event (such as a truncation of the Gaussian pulse), then the illusion breaks down.[9]
Group delay in audio
Group delay has some importance in the audio field and especially in the sound reproduction field.[10][11] Many components of an audio reproduction chain, notably loudspeakers and multiway loudspeaker crossover networks, introduce group delay in the audio signal.[2][11] It is therefore important to know the threshold of audibility of group delay with respect to frequency,[12][13][14] especially if the audio chain is supposed to provide high fidelity reproduction. The best thresholds of audibility table has been provided by Blauert and Laws.[15]
Frequency (kHz) |
Threshold (ms) |
Periods (Cycles) |
---|---|---|
0.5 | 3.2 | 1.6 |
1 | 2 | 2 |
2 | 1 | 2 |
4 | 1.5 | 6 |
8 | 2 | 16 |
Flanagan, Moore and Stone conclude that at 1, 2 and 4 kHz, a group delay of about 1.6 ms is audible with headphones in a non-reverberant condition.[16] Other experimental results suggest that when the group delay in the frequency range from 300 Hz to 1 kHz is below 1.0 ms, it is inaudible.[13]
The waveform of an audio signal can be reproduced exactly by a system that has a flat frequency response over the bandwidth of the signal and a phase delay that is equal to the group delay. Leach[17] introduced the concept of differential time-delay distortion, defined as the difference between the phase delay and the group delay, which is given by:
- .
An ideal system should exhibit zero or negligible differential time-delay distortion.[17]
It is possible to use digital signal processing techniques to correct the group delay distortion that arises due to the use of crossover networks in multi-way loudspeaker systems.[18] This involves considerable computational modeling of loudspeaker systems in order to successfully apply delay equalization,[19] using the Parks-McClellan FIR equiripple filter design algorithm.[1][5][20][21]
Group delay in optics
Group delay is important in physics, and in particular in optics.
In an optical fiber, group delay is the transit time required for optical power, traveling at a given mode's group velocity, to travel a given distance. For optical fiber dispersion measurement purposes, the quantity of interest is group delay per unit length, which is the reciprocal of the group velocity of a particular mode. The measured group delay of a signal through an optical fiber exhibits a wavelength dependence due to the various dispersion mechanisms present in the fiber.
It is often desirable for the group delay to be constant across all frequencies; otherwise there is temporal smearing of the signal. Because group delay is , it therefore follows that a constant group delay can be achieved if the transfer function of the device or medium has a linear phase response (i.e., where the group delay is a constant). The degree of nonlinearity of the phase indicates the deviation of the group delay from a constant value.
True time delay
A transmitting apparatus is said to have true time delay (TTD) if the time delay is independent of the frequency of the electrical signal.[22][23] TTD is an important characteristic of lossless and low-loss, dispersion free, transmission lines. TTD allows for a wide instantaneous signal bandwidth with virtually no signal distortion such as pulse broadening during pulsed operation.
See also
- Audio system measurements
- Bessel filter
- Eye pattern
- Group velocity — "The group velocity of light in a medium is the inverse of the group delay per unit length."[24]
References
This article incorporates public domain material from Federal Standard 1037C. General Services Administration. Archived from the original on 2022-01-22.
- Rabiner, Lawrence R.; Gold, Bernard (1975). Theory and Application of Digital Signal Processing. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. ISBN 0-13-914101-4.
- Preis, D. (1982). "Phase Distortion and Phase Equalization in Audio Signal Processing — A Tutorial Review". Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. 30 (11): 774–794. Retrieved 2022-05-22.
- Lathi, B. P. (2005). Linear Systems and Signals (Second ed.). Oxford University Press, Inc. ISBN 978-0-19-515833-5.
- Oppenheim, Alan V.; Schafer, R. W.; Buck, J. R. (1999). Discrete-Time Signal Processing. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. ISBN 0-13-754920-2.
- Oppenheim, Alan V.; Schafer, Ronald W. (2014). Discrete-Time Signal Processing. England: Pearson Education Limited. ISBN 978-1-292-02572-8.
- Ambardar, Ashok (1999). Analog and Digital Signal Processing (Second ed.). Cengage Learning. ISBN 9780534954093.
- Oppenheim, Alan V.; Willsky, Alan S.; Nawab, Hamid (1997). Signals and Systems. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. ISBN 0-13-814757-4.
- Nakanishi, Toshihiro; Sugiyama, K.; Kitano, M. (2002-01-01). "Demonstration of negative group delays in a simple electronic circuit". American Journal of Physics. 70 (11): 1117–1121. arXiv:quant-ph/0201001. doi:10.1119/1.1503378. S2CID 39928138.
- Bariska, Andor (2008). "Negative Group Delay" (PDF). Physical Meaning of Negative Group Delay?. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-10-16. Retrieved 2022-10-28.
- Plomp, R.; Steeneken, H. J. M. (1969). "Effect of Phase on the Timbre of Complex Tones". The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 46 (2B): 409–421. doi:10.1121/1.1911705. PMID 5804112.
- Ashley, J. (1980). Group and phase delay requirements for loudspeaker systems. ICASSP '80. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Vol. 5. pp. 1030–1033. doi:10.1109/ICASSP.1980.1170852.
- Möller, Henning (1975). "Loudspeaker phase measurements, transient response and audible quality" (PDF). Brüel & Kjaer (Application Note 17-198). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09. Retrieved 2022-05-22.
- Liski, J.; Mäkivirta, A.; Välimäki, V. (2018). Audibility of loudspeaker group-delay characteristics (PDF). 144th Audio Engineering Society International Convention, Paper Number 10008. Audio Engineering Society. pp. 879–888. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09. Retrieved 2022-05-21.
- Liski, Juho; Mäkivirta, Aki; Välimäki, Vesa (2021). "Audibility of Group-Delay Equalization". IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing. 29: 2189–2201. doi:10.1109/TASLP.2021.3087969. S2CID 236192266.
- Blauert, J.; Laws, P. (May 1978). "Group Delay Distortions in Electroacoustical Systems" (PDF). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 63 (5): 1478–1483. Bibcode:1978ASAJ...63.1478B. doi:10.1121/1.381841. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-09-30.
- Flanagan, Sheila; Moore, Brian C. J.; Stone, Michael A. (2005). "Discrimination of Group Delay in Clicklike Signals Presented via Headphones and Loudspeakers". Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. 53 (7/8): 593–611.
- Leach, Jr., W. Marshall (1989). "The Differential Time-Delay Distortion and Differential Phase-Shift Distortion as Measures of Phase Linearity" (PDF). Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. 37 (9): 709–715. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09.
- Adam, Veronique; Benz, Sebastien (2007). Correction of Crossover Phase Distortion Using Reversed Time All-Pass IIR Filter. 122nd Audio Engineering Society Convention. Retrieved 2022-05-22.
- Mäkivirta, Aki; Liski, Juho; Välimäki, Vesa (2018). "Modeling and Delay-Equalizing Loudspeaker Responses". Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. 66 (11): 922–934. doi:10.17743/jaes.2018.0053. S2CID 85506559. Retrieved 2022-05-22.
- McClellan, J.; Parks, T.; Rabiner, L. (1973). "A computer program for designing optimum FIR linear phase digital filters". IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics. 21 (6): 506–526. doi:10.1109/TAU.1973.1162525.
- Oppenheim, Alan V.; Schafer, Ronald W. (2010). Discrete-Time Signal Processing. England: Pearson Education Limited. ISBN 978-0-13-198842-2.
- "True Time Delay". Microwaves101, IEEE.
- Julius O. Smith III. "Phase Delay and Group Delay". Music 320 Background Reader. Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University.
- "Group Delay".