Pathological demand avoidance

Pathological demand avoidance is not recognized by the DSM-5 or ICD-10, the two main classification systems for mental disorders.[8] To be recognized, a sufficient amount of consensus and clinical history needs to be present, and as a newly proposed condition, PDA had not met the standard of evidence required at the time of recent revisions. However, DSM-5 also moved from sub-type classification to the use of ‘Autistic Spectrum Disorder’, which allows for the behavioural traits of different profiles to be described.

In 2011, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence commented on the fact that PDA has been proposed as part of the autism spectrum but did not include further discussion within the guideline.[1] NICE guidance also expects an ‘ASD’ diagnosis be accompanied by a diagnostic assessment, providing a profile of key strengths and difficulties. Demand avoidance is listed as a ‘sign or symptom of ASD’ (Appendix 3).[1]

Christopher Gillberg wrote a commentary article in 2014 that reviewed recent research and stated, “Experienced clinicians throughout child psychiatry, child neurology and paediatrics testify to its existence and the very major problems encountered when it comes to intervention and treatment.”[9]

As of 2014 there are no recognised diagnostic criteria.[8] Observations in children with PDA that were identified as common features[2] that potential possible diagnostic could be based on include:

1. Passive early history in the first year, avoiding ordinary demands and missing milestones
2. Continuing to avoid demands, panic attacks if demands are escalated
3. Surface sociability, but apparent lack of sense of social identity
4. Lability of mood and impulsivity
5. Comfortable in role play and pretending
6. Language delay, seemingly the result of passivity, often caught up quickly
7. Obsessive behaviour
8. Use of apparently socially manipulative and shocking behaviour[2]
9. Neurological signs (awkwardness, similar to autism spectrum disorders[10])

The underlying cause of demand avoidance in autistic children is said to be a high level of anxiety, usually from expectations of demands being placed on children, which can lead to a feeling of not being in control of a situation. Consequently, an additional diagnosis of generalised anxiety disorder or another anxiety disorder may be made instead of PDA.[11] About 40% of autistic people suffer from an anxiety disorder.[12]

Children with PDA feel threatened when they are not in control of their environment and their actions, which triggers the fight, flight or freeze response.[13]

'Pathological demand avoidance' has been criticized as a name for various reasons including the negative connotations some confronted with the word 'pathological' might have,[14] and alternative names like RDA for 'Rational Demand Avoidance'[15][16] or 'Pervasive Drive for Autonomy'[17][18] have been proposed and used.

Newson first began to look at PDA as a specific syndrome in the 1980s when certain children referred to the Child Development Clinic at the University of Nottingham appeared to display and share many of the same characteristics. These children had often been referred because they seemed to show many autistic traits, but were not typical in their presentation like those with classical autism or Asperger's syndrome. They had often been labelled as 'atypical autism' or Persistent Development Disorder-Not Otherwise Specified (PDD-NOS). Both of these terms were felt by parents to be unhelpful.

When Newson was made professor of developmental psychology at the University of Nottingham in 1994, she dedicated her inaugural lecture to talking about pathological demand avoidance syndrome.[19]

In 1997, the PDA Society was established in the UK by parents of children with a PDA profile of autism. It became a registered charity in January 2016.[20]

In July 2003, Newson published in Archives of Disease in Childhood for PDA to be recognised as a separate syndrome within the pervasive developmental disorders.[3]

In 2020, an Incorporated Association was established in Australia. 'Pathological Demand Avoidance Australia Inc.' became a registered charity early 2021.[21]

A systematic review published in 2021 by Kildahl et al [22] found that many of the studies published on PDA had methodological limitations, which restricted conclusions that could be drawn about patterns of behaviours characteristic of PDA. The authors noted that "currently, we still lack adequate information regarding the uniformity of demand avoidant behaviours, across individuals or over time."

Social psychologists Damian Milton and Devon Price have suggested the behaviour should not be considered pathological, and contextualise PDA as an example of individual autonomy or self-advocacy.[23]