Pressure ridge (ice)

A pressure ridge, when consisting of ice, is a linear pile-up of sea ice fragments formed in pack ice by accumulation in the convergence between floes.

Hypothetical interaction between two floes, resulting in a pressure ridge — a linear pile-up of sea ice fragments.
Internal structure of a first-year sea ice ridge, MOSAiC expedition, July 4, 2020.

Such a pressure ridge develops in an ice cover as a result of a stress regime established within the plane of the ice. Within sea ice expanses, pressure ridges originate from the interaction between floes,[note 1] as they collide with each other.[1] Currents and winds are the main driving forces, but the latter are particularly effective when they have a predominant direction.[2] Pressure ridges are made up of angular ice blocks of various sizes that pile up on the floes. The part of the ridge that is above the water surface is known as the sail; that below it as the keel.[note 2] Pressure ridges are the thickest sea ice features and account for up to 30-40% of the total sea ice area[3] and about one-half of the total sea ice volume.[4] Stamukhi are pressure ridges that are grounded and that result from the interaction between fast ice and the drifting pack ice.[5][6]

Internal structure

Although ice pressure ridges vary greatly in shape (which also evolves in time), this diagram (not to scale) shows how a drifting ridge is often idealized.[7][4]
Field example of a pressure ridge. Only the sail is shown in this photograph. The keel is more difficult to document.
Pressure ridge at North Pole, expedition of University of Giessen, April 17, 1990
A pressure ridge in the Antarctic ice near Scott Base, with lenticular clouds in the sky.

The blocks making up pressure ridges are mostly from the thinner ice floe involved in the interaction, but it can also include pieces from the other floe if it is not too thick.[1] In the summer, the ridge can undergo a significant amount of weathering, which turns it into a smooth hill. During this process, the ice loses its salinity (as a result of brine drainage and meltwater flushing). This is known as an aged ridge.[8]A fully consolidated ridge is one whose base has undergone complete freezing.[8] The term consolidated layer is used to designate freezing up of the rubble just below the water line.[2] The existence of a consolidated layer depends on air temperature — in this layer, the water between individual blocks is frozen, with a resulting reduction in porosity and an increase in mechanical strength. A keel's depth of an ice ridge is much higher than its sail's height - typically about 3-5 times. The keel is also 2-3 times wider than the sail.[9] Ridges are usually melting faster than level ice, both at the surface[10] and at the bottom.[11] Sea-ice ridges also play an important role in confining meltwater within under-ice meltwater layers, which may lead to the formation of false bottoms.[12]

Thickness and consolidation

One of the largest pressure ridges on record had a sail extending 12 m above the water surface, and a keel depth of 45 m.[1] The total thickness for a multiyear ridge was reported to be 40 m.[13] On average, total thickness ranges between 5 and 30 m and 30 m,[4] with a mean sail height that remains below 2 m.[2] The average keel depth of Artic ridges is 4.5 m. The sail height is usually proportional to the square root of ridge block thickness.

The average consolidated layer thickness of Artic ridges is 1.6 m. Usually, ridges are consolidating faster than level ice because of their initial macroporosity. Ridge rubble porosity (or solid ice fraction of ridge unconsolidated part) is in the wide rage of 10-40%. During winter, ice ridges are consolidating up to two times faster than level ice, with the ratio of level ice and consolidated layer thickness proportional to the square root of ridge rubble porosity.[14] This results in 1.6-1.8 ratio of consolidated layer and level ice thickness by the end of winter season.[15] Meanwhile, snow is usually about three times thicker above ridges than above level ice.[16] Sometimes ridges can be found fully consolidated with the total thickness up to 8 m.[17]

Characterization methods

The physical characterization of pressure ridges can be done using the following methods:[2]

Interest for pressure ridges

From an offshore engineering and naval perspective, there are three reasons why pressure ridges are a subject of investigation.[4] Firstly, because the highest loads applied on offshore structures operating in cold oceans by drift ice are associated with these features. Secondly, when pressure ridges drift into shallower areas, their keel may come into contact with the seabed, thereby representing a risk for subsea pipelines (see Seabed gouging by ice) and other seabed installations. Thirdly, they have a significant impact on navigation. In the Arctic, ridged ice makes up about 40% of the overall mass of sea ice.[9][3] First-year ridges with large macroporosity are important for the ice-associated sympagic communities and identified as potential ecological hotspots and proposed to serve as refugia of ice-associated organisms.[22]

See also

Notes

  1. A floe is any individual piece of sea ice larger than 20 m (66 ft).
  2. These terms also apply for any floating ice feature, such as icebergs.

References

  1. Weeks, W. F. (2010) On sea ice. University of Alaska Press, Fairbanks, 664 p.
  2. Strub-Klein, L. & Sudom, D. (2012). A comprehensive analysis of the morphology of first-year sea ice ridges. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 82, pp. 94-109.
  3. Hansen, E., Ekeberg, O. ‐C., Gerland, S., Pavlova, O., Spreen, G., Tschudi, M. (2014), Variability in categories of Arctic sea ice in Fram Strait, American Geophysical Union (AGU)
  4. Leppäranta, M. (2005). The Drift of Sea Ice. Springer-Verlag, New York, 266 p.
  5. Barnes, P.W., D., McDowell & Reimnitz, E. (1978). Ice gouging characteristics: Their changing patterns from 1975-1977, Beaufort Sea, Alaska. United States Department of the Interior, Geological Survey Open File Report 78-730, Menlo Park, U.S.A., 42 p.
  6. Ogorodov, S.A. & Arkhipov, V.V. (2010) Caspian Sea bottom scouring by hummocky ice floes. Doklady Earth Sciences, 432, 1, pp. 703-707.
  7. Timco, G. W. & Burden, R. P. (1997). An analysis of the shapes of sea ice ridges. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 25, pp. 65-77.
  8. http://nsidc.org/cryosphere/seaice/index.html Archived 2012-10-28 at the Wayback Machine.
  9. Wadhams, P. (2000). Ice in the Ocean. Gordon and Breach Science Publ., London, 351 p.
  10. Perovich, D. K. (2003), Thin and thinner: Sea ice mass balance measurements during SHEBA, American Geophysical Union (AGU)
  11. Amundrud, T. L. (2004), "Geometrical constraints on the evolution of ridged sea ice", Journal of Geophysical Research
  12. Salganik, Evgenii; Katlein, Christian; Lange, Benjamin A.; Matero, Ilkka; Lei, Ruibo; Fong, Allison A.; Fons, Steven W.; Divine, Dmitry; Ogiier, Marc; Castellani, Giulia; Bozzato, Deborah; Chamberlain, Emelia J.; Hoppe, Clara J.M.; Muller, Oliver; Gardner, Jessie.; Rinke, Annette; Pereira, Patric Simões; Ulfsbo, Adam; Marsay, Chris; Webster, Melinda A.; Maus, Sönke; Høyland, Knut V.; Granskog, Mats A. (2023). "Temporal evolution of under-ice meltwater layers and false bottoms and their impact on summer Arctic sea ice mass balance". Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene. 11 (1). doi:10.1525/elementa.2022.00035.
  13. Johnston, M., Masterson, D. & Wright, B. (2009). Multi-year ice thickness: knowns and unknowns. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions (POAC), Luleå, Sweden.
  14. Leppäranta, M., Hakala, R. (1992), "The structure and strength of first-year ice ridges in the Baltic Sea", Cold Regions Science and Technology
  15. Salganik, E., Høyland, K. V., Maus, S. (2020), "Consolidation of fresh ice ridges for different scales", Cold Regions Science and Technology
  16. Itkin, P., Hendricks, S., Webster, M., Albedyll, L. von, Arndt, S., Divine, D., Jaggi, M., Oggier, M., Raphael, I., Ricker, R., Rohde, J., Schneebeli, M., Liston, G. E. (2023), Sea ice and snow characteristics from year-long transects at the MOSAiC Central Observatory, University of California Press
  17. Marchenko, A. (2022), Thermo-Hydrodynamics of Sea Ice Rubble, Springer International Publishing
  18. Leppäranta, M., Lensu, M., Kosloff, P., Veitch, B. (1995), "The life story of a first-year sea ice ridge", Cold Regions Science and Technology
  19. Kharitonov, V. V. (2008), "Internal structure of ice ridges and stamukhas based on thermal drilling data", Cold Regions Science and Technology
  20. Salganik, E., Høyland, K. V., Shestov, A. (2021), "Medium-scale experiment in consolidation of an artificial sea ice ridge in Van Mijenfjorden, Svalbard", Cold Regions Science and Technology
  21. Itkin, P., Hendricks, S., Webster, M., Albedyll, L. von, Arndt, S., Divine, D., Jaggi, M., Oggier, M., Raphael, I., Ricker, R., Rohde, J., Schneebeli, M., Liston, G. E. (2023), "Sea ice and snow characteristics from year-long transects at the MOSAiC Central Observatory", Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene
  22. Fernández-Méndez, M., Olsen, L. M., Kauko, H. M., Meyer, A., Rösel, A., Merkouriadi, I., Mundy, C. J., Ehn, J. K., Johansson, A. M., Wagner, P. M., Ervik, Å., Sorrell, B. K., Duarte, P., Wold, A., Hop, H., Assmy, P. (2018), "Algal Hot Spots in a Changing Arctic Ocean: Sea-Ice Ridges and the Snow-Ice Interface", Frontiers in Marine Science
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.