Vulgar Marxism
Vulgar Marxism is a particular "belief that one can directly access the real conditions of history" and is sometimes referred to as "reflection theory"[1]
Robert M. Young (1998) stated that "Vulgar Marxism" was
The defining feature of Marxist approaches to the history of science is that the history of scientific ideas, of research priorities, of concepts of nature and of the parameters of discoveries are all rooted in historical forces which are, in the last instance, socio-economic.
He adds that "There are variations in how literally this is taken and various Marxist-inspired and Marxist-related positions define the interrelations among science and other historical forces more or less loosely. There is a continuum of positions. The most orthodox provides one-to-one correlations between the socio-economic base and the intellectual superstructure. This is referred to as economism or vulgar Marxism."[2][3]
John Phillips of National University of Singapore states that Julia Kristeva understands "vulgar Marxism" as synonymous with "Vulgar Sociologism", a view that "characterises ideology in terms of a superstructure determined by an economic/historical base (base and superstructure)."[4]
References
- Dino Felluga. "Modules on Marx: On Ideology. Introductory Guide to Critical Theory". Purdue University..
- Policy Futures in Education, Volume 3, Number 1, 2005. Transmodernism, Marxism and Social Change: some implications for teacher education Mike Cole, Bishop Grosseteste College, Lincoln, United Kingdom
- Young, R.M. (1998) https://web.archive.org/web/20180507121440/http://www.human-nature.com/rmyoung/papers/pap104h.html Marxism and the History of Science The Human Nature Review.
- Julia Kristeva, "The System and the Speaking Subject"